«Return to Blog List Customer Case Studies: The “Maybe” Language Legal Loves
In the world of customer stories, “legal” just might be our arch nemesis.
Where marketers look for strong, absolute endorsement statements from customers, legal reviewers at vendor and customer companies prefer muddier terms.
The language legal likes isn’t the clean and action-oriented phrasing marketers and copywriters have been taught to use.
It’s understandable. They don’t want it to appear that stellar results can always be expected.
Unfortunately, it’s the culture we live in.
This varies from company to company. The larger the vendor or customer company, the more likely legal reviewers will go to town with the “Track Changes” feature of Microsoft Word.
What does that mean?
One company in particular I’ve worked with has its legal sensitivity meter set extra high. If you want to work with them, you’ve got to shift your language from absolute, action words to kinda, sorta, maybe terms.
Here’s your guide to creating a case study legal will love. Substitute the “before” words with the following “after” phrasing:
|Drives||is intended to drive|
|All campaigns||some campaigns|
|Pays off||can pay off|
|Increases||is intended to increase|
|Automates||is designed to automate|
|Triggers||can be used to trigger|
Wow, huh? That really takes the punch out of a customer case study or testimonial.
This mostly refers to the paraphrased part of your stories, not actual customer quotes. But at times legal will question customer quotes as well.
While this example maybe be more extreme, now you know how to get a story past the most persnickety legal gatekeeper – when you have to. But always start out with your strong, absolute language until you know it’s not going to fly.
Then you can kinda, sorta, maybe tone it down as needed.
Any stories to share in your battles with legal?